
(DailyVantage.com) – The reinstatement of Matthew Luckhurst, a controversial former San Antonio police officer known for a notorious incident, raises pivotal questions about ethics and accountability in law enforcement.
At a Glance
- Matthew Luckhurst was fired for allegedly giving a homeless man a feces-laced sandwich in 2016.
- San Antonio Police Chief William McManus deemed the act “vile and disgusting.”
- Luckhurst claims the sandwich was intended for disposal, not consumption.
- Despite past allegations, Luckhurst now serves at Benavides Police Department with no reported issues.
Incident and Allegations
In 2016, Matthew Luckhurst, a San Antonio police officer, faced dismissal over allegations of providing a homeless man with a sandwich filled with feces. San Antonio Police Chief William McManus described the incident as a “vile and disgusting act.” Luckhurst has consistently asserted that the sandwich was intended for disposal, not for consumption, and the homeless man did not eat it.
Later that same year, further allegations surfaced, accusing Luckhurst of defecating in a department restroom and smearing feces-like substance on a toilet seat. Despite appealing his initial firing, Luckhurst briefly returned to the San Antonio force in 2019, only to be dismissed again in 2020.
Rehabilitation and Reinstatement
After leaving San Antonio, Luckhurst served as a police officer in Floresville in 2022 but was let go after ten months. However, the Benavides Police Department appointed him in 2023, highlighting his positive behavior since being relisted. Benavides Police Chief Andre Hines remarked that Luckhurst’s hiring “reflects the department’s commitment to honesty and accountability.” A thorough background check was conducted prior to his employment, reassuring the community of his rehabilitated status.
Luckhurst’s record in Benavides has been exemplary, with no complaints or issues reported at present. Chief Hines emphasized that “a thorough background check” was performed, and all aspects of Luckhurst’s history were carefully considered before his hiring.
Ethical Questions and Public Trust
The decision to reinstate officers with controversial pasts such as Luckhurst’s often stirs debate over law enforcement ethics and public trust. Critics argue that repeated misconduct should disqualify individuals permanently from policing roles. Yet, departments like Benavides see value in offering a second chance if behavioral reforms are evident.
This case challenges communities to weigh the principles of forgiveness and accountability, affecting their faith in law enforcement institutions. As Luckhurst serves once more, the unfolding outcome of his reinstatement might influence future policies regarding rehiring officers with troubling histories.
Copyright 2025, DailyVantage.com