(DailyVantage.com) – Authorities are delving deeper into the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, revealing possible ties to a wider conspiracy.
At a Glance
- The attempt allegedly involves a “criminal network” beyond the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks.
- Private investigator Doug Hagmann’s analysis suggests Crooks was not acting alone.
- The Heritage Foundation used mobile data to identify potential connections to the FBI.
- Questions about FBI transparency and a suspected cover-up persist.
Unraveling Alleged Conspiracy
The New York Post’s report on the July 13 assassination plot against Donald Trump has spurred a trail of suspicions regarding the involvement of a broader “criminal network.” Authorities arrested Thomas Matthew Crooks, but recent findings indicate that Crooks might have operated under the influence of a clandestine group. With geofencing technology and crucial interviews, investigators have proposed the possibility of hidden collaborators supporting Crooks.
Doug Hagmann, hired to scrutinize the affair, found advanced planning and coordination beyond Crooks’ abilities, indicating external influence. Despite Crooks’ sociable and intelligent reputation, his intentions remain questioned. Experts believe this attempt demanded premeditated external backing.
TRUMP SHOOTER UPDATE: Representative Mike Waltz has revealed that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the individual who attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump, had multiple encrypted accounts overseas, specifically mentioning Germany among other locations like Belgium and New… pic.twitter.com/hJNmysauJp
— Liquid News Feed (@liquidnewsfeed) August 22, 2024
Evidence Linking External Influences
The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project used mobile ad data to trace Crooks’ contacts, unveiling potential ties to an FBI site in Washington, D.C. This finding has stimulated concerns about the organization’s role and transparency in the investigation. Hagmann argues that key players involved remain outside law enforcement’s reach, fueling cover-up speculation.
The investigation’s course could reveal cooperation or coercion, spreading unease about concealed partnerships aiming at Trump’s significant disruption. Skepticism grows over the chances of uncovering substantial evidence, citing a lack of detectable paperwork or internet traces.
Conspiracy Questions Remain
Skepticism regarding the FBI’s operations and their transparency persists, complicated by doubts about whether leadership transitions will spur greater openness. Investigators continue exploring the possibility of radicalization and comprehensive conspiracies but face challenges due to scarce physical or digital evidence.
“It’s presented like an open-and-shut case like, ‘Oh, he went crazy,’ but it doesn’t really add up. It’s like JFK. Do we think we’ve become so modern that wouldn’t happen again?” – Mark Sigaroos
The unfolding situation emphasizes the need for vigilant scrutiny and truth-seeking amidst alleged hidden networks entwined in this alarming plot, with ongoing questions about institutional accountability and potential oversight failings.
Copyright 2025, DailyVantage.com
