
(DailyVantage.com) – The Trump administration’s decision to suspend the $20 billion climate fund raises questions amid alleged criminal activity.
At a Glance
- FBI-led investigation prompts halt of the $20 billion fund by Trump administration.
- Senator Whitehouse accuses the EPA of exploiting law enforcement for political motives.
- Citibank instructed to cease fund distributions pending investigation outcomes.
- Fund suspension affects critical climate programs and sparks lawsuits.
Investigation and Suspension Details
The FBI has instigated an investigation into the $20 billion climate fund originally established as part of Biden’s EPA initiative. This action led to the Trump administration ordering a suspension, uncovering concerns of criminal misconduct. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Treasury instructed Citibank, which manages the funds, to halt any further financial activity as evidence mounts.
Citibank is closely following government directives, and an attorney for Citibank emphasized that it has “been instructed by EPA and the Department of Treasury to pause all further disbursements.” Amid this development, several climate organizations, such as Power Forward Communities, have filed lawsuits against Citibank for contract breaches due to the halted funds.
NEW: The top criminal prosecutor at the Washington, D.C. US Attorney’s Office, Denise Cheung, has resigned after the Trump administration requested she investigate and freeze funding related to climate spending under the Biden administration, according to CNN.
“Earlier… pic.twitter.com/goI3l5UrkE
— RedWave Press (@RedWave_Press) February 18, 2025
Political Accusations and Legal Disputes
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has fiercely criticized the Trump administration’s actions, accusing the EPA of “misusing law enforcement” to retrieve the funds under false pretenses. This accusation suggests the possibility of the government’s interference to benefit Trump’s alleged political agendas. Furthermore, these legal proceedings have potentially delayed crucial energy and climate initiatives.
As a result of these disruptions, organizations such as Climate United have claimed significant harm to American households and criticized the EPA for unlawfully ending grant agreements. Proceedings in court may soon uncover specific allegations of misconduct, potentially providing further clarity on the freeze’s legitimacy.
Eventually BIDEN mind as claimed by media that it doenst work but that motxxerfucker dispite that did so many fraud ..
Trump administration probes suspected fraud in Biden’s climate fund – WaPo
The $20 billion grant program was established by the former president to finance… pic.twitter.com/AmV9evTIYT
— Mark Brewer (@theapril29th) March 3, 2025
Impact on Climate Initiatives
The suspension has considerably impacted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, a pivotal component of Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, designed to allocate $27 billion towards clean energy investments. This fund was earmarked for distribution through politically connected NGOs, some of which are reportedly new and lack necessary qualifications. The freeze has already led to significant disbursements being withheld, causing a ripple effect in ongoing projects associated with environmental sustainability.
“Citibank has … only done its best to serve its customers while following instructions from the government of the United States, to whom Citibank owes a duty of loyalty and at whose direction Citibank is contractually obligated to act” – Allen
This interruption has engendered a substantial challenge to ongoing and planned climate initiatives, with state and local governments scrambling to find alternative funding or face pauses in their environmental projects. As a result, the debate over the proper use of climate funds and governmental accountability continues to gain momentum amid partisan divides.
Copyright 2025, DailyVantage.com